As the U.S. judicial system receives increasing scrutiny, it may be time to ask the question: are we a land of laws?
This might seem like an odd question to ask, when the United States has a well-established judicial system. There are countless number of judges and lawyers that help to argue and interpret the various laws that have been passed.
In addition, who among has not been called to serve on a jury? One of the primary civil services one can perform, other than voting in elections, is to sit for a trial.
So at the local, state, regional, and federal level, trials are happening all the time, involving just about any and all people in our society.
And yet, confidence in our judicial system is waning. Some courts deliver seemingly unfair rulings. Others blatantly contradict existing precedence. Some judges seem hopelessly biassed. Other courts reek of corruption.
Finally, and most disturbingly, there is a growing sense that existing laws are not applied evenly to everyone. Different people receive different outcomes, based on their economic background, their race, or even what job title they hold. Conviction and incarceration rates are higher for minorities.
If the laws don’t apply to everyone, can we really say that live in a land of laws? Is the legal system just another way for the powerful in our country to control the less powerful? Or is it that these problems are exaggerated, and the courts, and laws, are in pretty good shape?
Related questions: What direct experience do you have with law enforcement? When should you not follow the law? How would you describe your civic life? Where is society failing?